The Palestinian-Israeli conflict

The Palestinian-Israeli remainderAcross the Muslim world it is a common refrain that heaven is the mother of all businesss. (Atran Ginges 2009 http//www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/ imprint/25atran .html) That these claims could be made round such a small piece of land, particularly angiotensin-converting enzyme which has so little oil is extraordinary, serving only to highlighting the importance of finding a reply to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. To meet, the numerous attempts at solving the conflict draw all ended in failure. The prospects for a peaceful resolving in the foreseeable future look bleak, with a wide range of factors contributing towards this, most notably the role of extremists, the failure of the peace process, actions of the Israeli Goernment, splits among the Palestinians and the actions of extracurricular parties who benefit from the continuation of the conflict, as well as more fundamental underlying dis stipulations, particularly the refugee problem a nd the s everywhereeignty of East Jerusalem.The Palestinian Israeli conflict is primarily a dispute everyplace the control of land. It has been described by Amos Oz, an Israeli journalist and author, as a tragedy, a clash between one very powerful, very convincing, very painful claim over this land and another no less powerful, no less convincing claim. (Oz 2002 http//www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_ east/jan-june02/oz_1-23.html) In 1947 the UN passed a partition plan, attempting to find a solution to both of these claims, however this was rejected by the Arabs of Palestine and civil war broke out between them and the Jews of Palestine. (McDowall 24 1995) afterward Israel decl ared its independence on 14th May 1948, m both of the surrounding Arab countries sent forces to attack the new state of Israel. In the 1967 6 Day War, Israel gained the Sinai Peninsula and the Gaza Strip from Egypt, the Golan Heights from Syria, and the West trust and East Jerusalem from Jordan. (Smith 2004 279) Having returned the Sinai Peninsula to Egypt in 1979-1982, in 1993 Israel and Palestine signed the Oslo Accords, which agreed Israeli breakup from parts of the West Bank and the Gaza strip, as well as for Palestinian self-government within those areas. (Smith 2004 438) Despite strong believes for a final status covenant at the bivouac David Summit in July 2000, this was not reached. After the Al-Aqsa Intifada broke out later that year and the subsequent deterioration in Palestinian-Israeli relations, agreement presently looks a long way off. The devil-state solution is the consensus solution to the conflict, with polling indicating that it has the support of the majority of both Palestinians and Israelis. (Pallister 2009 http// www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/apr/22/israel-palestine-poll) Neither sees this as their ideal solution however a majority of both recognise it is the only realistic way for peace to occur.Extremists on both sides present a constant impediment towar ds solving the conflict. Rather than accepting that compromises are necessary, they are dismissive of the other sides reform to exist. In Israel, at that place are organisations, including members of Benjamin Netanyahus current cabinet, that still believe that the Jewish State should include most, if not all, of Greater Israel, which among other areas, contains the West Bank. (Zakaria 2010 http//www.cnn. com/2010/OPINION/03/18/zakaria.israel.mistake) Among Palestinians, extremists reject Israels right to exist and work to stop the curtain raising of peaceful coexistence. They tolerate launched suicide attacks against Israeli civilians in their attempts to disrupt peace negotiations.Part of the reason peace has been difficult to achieve post-2000 has been the change in tactual sensation among Israeli citizens that peace is a realistic guess. When the Oslo Accords were signed, Israelis saw that by discontinueing Palestinians to self-govern, they were taking large risks and mak ing a significant compromise. They tend to perceive the Camp David offer to the Palestinians as fair and just, and blame the lack of peace on Yasser Arafat for refusing to take it. (Morris 2009 135) With the Al-Aqsa Intifada beginning in late 2000 and causing the deaths of over a thousand Israeli civilians, (Catignani 2008 103) Israelis increasingly began to see the Palestinians as unwilling to make the compromises necessary for a two-state solution, destroying the belief of much of Israeli society in the possibility of peace. (Catignani 2008 103) This was only confirmed by the comprehensive victory of Hamas over the more moderate but corruption ridden Fatah in the Palestinian legislative choice of 2006. Although alike a social organisation, Hamas had perpetrated numerous suicide bombings against Israeli civilians, and rejects any attempt at a political settlement with Israel. (Mishal Sela 2006 52) In this context, many Israelis have concluded that they do not have a partner in a chieving peace. Given that allowing the Palestinians to self-rule under the Oslo Accords had created areas from which it was significantly easier to plot attacks on Israel, (Catignani 2008 131) they are incredibly wary of giving the Palestinians control of more land, questioning whether organisations such as Hamas will ever cease to attack Israel.Post-2000, the actions of the Israeli government have also made an end to the conflict significantly more difficult to achieve. Thousands of Palestinians have died at the hands of the Israel Defence Forces, with more suffering serious injuries. In 2005 Israel unilaterally withdrew from Gaza, however the area has been under blockade since 2007, preventing the access of vital food and medical supplies. In May 2008, even before the more new Gaza War of 2008-09, the International Committee of the Red Cross estimated that over 70% of Gazans were living(a) in poverty. (ICRC 2009 http//www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/html /palestine-report-260 609) In the West Bank the about decade-long downturn has been largely a result of Israeli closure policieswhich disrupted labor flows, manufacturing, and commerce, both external and internal. (CIA World Factbook 2010 https//www.cia.gov/libr ary/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/we.html)Since 2002 the Israeli Government has been constructing the West Bank Barrier. Built to protect Israeli citizens from attacks, it has succeeded in vastly reducing the number of Israeli civilian casualties. (Gelvin 2007 249) Controversially, however, rather than being built following Israels 1949 Armistice lines, it deviates into areas captured by Israel in 1967. The International Court of Justice proclaimed that construction of the barrier is contrary to international law (ICJ 2004 http//www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?pr=71p1=3p2=1 case=131p3=6) and it has also been criticised as an Israeli attempt to create an illegal unilateral solution, which severely suspensionricts the lives of those livin g inside the barrier. (Shindler 2008 326)I loved to play fannyball with my friends. I told the doctors that I cute to be able to walk again they promised that I would.Ghassan, 14 years old, Gaza City. His older brother was killed and he himself was wounded during the military operation. He is waiting to be fitted with artificial limbs for both legs.The continued expansion of settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem also contributes towards making the conflict increasingly difficult to solve. Deemed as illegal by numerous UN Security Council Resolutions, (Qurie 2008 166) each new settlement is another settlement which may have to be dismantled in any realistic peace deal, and to continue building them shows a clear lack of commitment to peace.The actions of the IDF and the Israeli Government have helped created a generation of Palestinians that hate Israel and Jews. To those living inside the West Bank wall or in poverty-stricken Gaza, the message of extremists resonates. I sraeli action is thus helping cause the circumstances from which extremists and possible suicide bombers emerge, creating a cycle of violence which is difficult to reverse. (Kamrava 2005 238)Splits among the Palestinians have also made it more difficult to end the conflict. Starting in December 2006, and act on-and-off to the present day, in that location has been a Civil War between Hamas and Fatah. Currently, Hamas control Gaza, whilst Fatah control the West Bank. This lack of unification within the Palestinians makes an end to the Palestine Israeli conflict impossible. For peace, a Palestinian attraction would have to accept a deal which would to some extent not entirely fulfil the aspirations of the Palestinian people, and this leader would have to successfully convince them that taking it was their best option. Before his death in 2004, Yasser Arafat might possibly have been able to do this. Currently, there is no-one. Even before the Hamas-Fatah conflict, Israel had compla ined that there was no one to talk to among the Palestinians. (Gelvin 2007 246) Until the Hamas-Fatah conflict is to some extent resolved, there is no one that the Israelis can talk to about a deal.On the assumption that Palestinians and Israelis could be bought together for serious and meaningful negotiations, there are numerous disputes which would be very difficult to solve. Two of these, the refugee problem and the dispute over East Jerusalem, seem particularly difficult to resolve.In 1948, approximately 700,000 Palestinians became refugees after either fleeing or being forced to leave, with many more becoming refugees after the Six Day War. (Morris 2004 604) Many of them live in the West Bank and Gaza, but they have spread amongst the Arab World. Despite this, they have never been truly assimilated into the populations of these other countries with Jordan being the only Arab state to have allowed large numbers of them to gain full citizenship. (Miller Samuels 2009 http//www.in dependent.co.uk/news/world/ middle-east/no-way-home-the-tragedy-of-the-palestinian-diaspora-1806790.html)Palestinian refugees claim that the UN guarantees their right to return under UN General Assembly Resolution 194. Israel has rejected this interpretation of the resolution and has never complied with it. They also argue that an acceptance of the Palestinians right to return would pick out about the end of Israel as a Jewish State. Whilst few of the 1948 refugees are still alive, their descendants have spent their whole lives fighting for what they see as rightfully theirs, and will not give this up without significant recompense. Disagreement on the issue of the refugees is one of the central reasons for the failure of the Camp David Summit. (Smith 2004 498)Of all of the territorial reserve disagreements, Jerusalem is the most difficult to solve. Even assuming that agreement could be reached on all other territorial disputes, it is difficult to envision agreement over Jerusalem. From 1948-67 West Jerusalem was under Israeli control, with East Jerusalem under Arab (Jordanian) control. East Jerusalem contains the Temple Mount, the site of the ancient Jewish Temple. The site of the two ancient temples, tradition states that it will be the site of the third and final temple. It is considered the holiest site within Judaism, so holy, that many Jews will not set foot on it. To Muslims, the Temple Mount is the site of the Al-Aqsa mosque and of the Prophet Muhammads ascent to heaven. It is widely regarded as the third holiest site in Islam. (Shindler 2008 282)Current Israeli Prime rector Benjamin Netanyahu has pledged that A united Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. Jerusalem was and will always be ours. It shall never be divided. (Reuters 2009 http//www.reuters.com/article/idUSLL96214120090521) This highlights quite how faraway away the current Israeli leadership is from meaningful and realistic peace discussions. However it is still almost impossible to compr ehend that any Israeli leader would negotiate away The Temple Mount and the Western Wall.It is equally impossible to imagine any Palestinian leader relinquishing their claims over the Temple Mount. Palestinians tactile sensation that by accepting Israelis right to exist and a state broadly along the 1967 borders, they are making huge concessions. Giving up The Dome of the oscillate and the Al Aqsa Mosque is something that is just one step too far. Even if a Palestinian leader were to make an agreement, it is virtually impossible to imagine that they would persuade the rest of the Palestinian people to accept it peacefully.Lastly, there are outside actors that benefit from the continuation of the conflict. Palestine would also be removed as an issue over which the Islamic world could unify, whereas hatred towards the USA and Israel would begin to disappear. If a peace effort led by the USA was achieved, this would be a major diplomatical victory for them. Regardless of statements s uggesting they would support a two state solution, (Spillius 2009 http//www.telegraph.co .uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/5225705/Irans-President-would-support-two-state-solution-for-Israel.html) this would be undesirable to the Iranian leadership. Syria, which has its own territorial dispute with Israel, would not allow any peace deal between the Palestinians and Israel to occur unless its dispute with Israel was settled. The Iranians and Syrians will thus continue to assist and fund groups that help keep the conflict going.To conclude, there is a wide variety of reasons, some ancient, some more recent, that have made the Palestinian Israeli conflict so difficult to solve today. After so much promise during the 1990s that a deal could be reached, the chances of an end to the conflict have taken several steps backwards over the last decade. Despite this,The two-state solution remains the only viable solution. Its pitfalls are numerous and significant. However, as the Israeli Presi dent Shimon Peres argued last year, a one-state solution has abounding intrinsic flaws to render it no solution at all. signifying the end of the existence of a Jewish state (Peres 2009 http//www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/09/AR2009020902098.html) Whilst there was much hope that movement towards the opening of meaningful negotiations would be re-started with the election of President Obama, this hope has largely evaporated, resulting in the continuation of the conflict for the foreseeable future.BibliographyAtran, S. Ginges, J. (2009) How Words Could End a War (24/01/2008) http//www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/opinion/25atran.html date accessed 19/03/2010Catignani, S. (2008) Israeli Counter-Insurgency and the Intifadas Dilemmas of a conventional army New York RoutledgeCIA World Factbook West Bank (04/03/2010) https//www.cia.gov/library/publications/the world-factbook/geos/we.html date accessed 19/03/2010Gelvin, J. (2007) The Israel-Palestine Conflict One Hundred Years of War Cambridge Cambridge University PressICJ (2004) Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian land (9/07/2004) http//www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?pr=71p1=3p2=1case= 131p3=6 date accessed 19/03/2010ICRC (2009) Gaza 1.5 million people trapped in despair (29/06/2009) http//www.icrc.org/ web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/palestine-report-260609 date accessed 19/03/2009Kamrava, M. (2005) The redbrick Middle East A Political chronicle Since The First World War London University of California PressMcDowall, D. (1995) The Palestinians The Road to Nationhood London Minority Rights PublicationsMiller, J. Samuels, D. (2009) No way home The tragedy of the Palestinian diaspora (22/10/2009) http//www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/no-way-home-the-tragedy-of-the-palestinian-diaspora-1806790.html date accessed 19/03/2010Mishal, S. Sela A. (2006) The Palestinian Hamas Vision, Violence and Coexistence New York Columbia University PressMorris, B. ( 2004) The turn out of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited Cambridge Cambridge University PressMorris, B. (2009) One State, Two States New Haven Yale University PressOz, A. (2002) Coping With Conflict A NewsHour with Jim Lehrer Transcript (23/01/2002) http//www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/jan-june02/oz_1-23.html date accessed 19/03/2010Pallister, D. (2009) or so Palestinians and Israelis willing to accept two-state solution, poll finds (22/04/2009) http//www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/apr/22/israel-palestine-poll date accessed 19/03/2010Peres, S. (2009) One Region, Two States (10/02/2009) http//www.washingtonpost.com/ wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/09/AR2009020902098.html date accessed 19/03/2010Qurie, A. (2008) Beyond Oslo, The struggle For Palestine London Tauris Co LtdReuters (2009) Israeli PM says Jerusalem will never be divided (21/05/2009) http//www.reuters.com/article/idUSLL96214120090521 date accessed 19/03/2010Shindler, C. (2008) A History of Modern Israel New Y ork Cambridge University PressSmith, C. (2004) Palestine and The Arab-Israeli Conflict Fifth Edition A History With Documents Palgrave Macmillan BasingstokeSpillius, A. (2009) Irans President would support two-state solution for Israel (26/04/2009) http//www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/5225705/Irans-President-would-support-two-state-solution-for-Israel.html date accessed 19/03/2010Zakaria, F. (2010) Israel is making a big mistake (18/03/2010) http//www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/03/18/zakaria.israel.mistake date accessed 19/03/2010