Impact of Managers and Leaders in Organizations on the Motivation of Employees Essay

whatever scheme is al ways started with an elaborated target to fulfill based on arrangement and strategies to be utilise in the slaying of achieving those goals. Actually the objective, writ of execution and the methodology in which the organization is set up and run, defines its kind and qualification in relation to other organizations. Organization consists of staffs that ar categorized depending on the duty performed and the responsibilities that are bestowed upon them.In order to achieve conquest an form system is essential which go away involve a specified hierarchy which understandably positions each and every individual in relation to the capacity and the type of responsibilities. Under this arrangement management and leadinghip are considered to be the key genes in accomplishing the targets. Management comprises duties that fully covers directly or indirectly the whole structure of the organization. It combines aspects like controlling all the operations of th e confederacy inclusive of planning events, strategic steps to be followed and even the necessity concepts that breaks the organization.Management is excessively involved in the overall organization of the accessible resources that are associated with the whole operation. Management determines the kind of employees working in an organization which is brought slightly by the coordination and leadinghip that is developed towards the employees. All the functions of management are carried out by the managers in the organization. Leadership and management are tie in terminologies and they are inseparable in the sense that managers also play the mathematical function of leadership. A leader directiones for the nigh part on the directives to be followed by the employers in the effectiveness of their duties.This is mostly done in an interactive method and understanding the factors that affect or hinder the exertions. Both managers and leaders play an essential role in propel their employees. Despite the fact that the employees may intelligibly understand their responsibilities and duties in the organization, fully desirable outcomes may be touch on by lack of demand. According to (Geary, D. C. (2005)) motivation is a key factor in influencing someone to desire to add extra exploit to improve the work and achieve more than expected.Through the coordination of mind motivation also promotes the inward generation of go forth power which alternatively has a large physical contribution to human body. Depending on the type of organization leaders and managers may apply different methods in make the employees. Some of the ways used by managers in motivation are like organizing functions which involve honoring and payoffing specific employees following their best achievement. This is a frequent method but it enhances the spirit of corroboratory competition amongst the employees.Satisfaction is other means applied by managers to motivate employees. A satisfied employee leave alone hurt more pass on to work. Career and talents recognition which is mostly applied by leaders to appreciate their employees plays a part in motivating them. Leaders on the other hand recommend the promotion of herculean working employees to the management which also motivates the employees. Some managers have introduced a doctrinal salary increase which may be annual or afterward a specified period. This does not necessary depend on the loot made by the company but on the period dog-tired by the employee working in the company.Bonuses and commissions on the other hand are sometimes measured against the benefits realized by the organization within a specified duration. These are among factors of motivating the employees. Following the performance and the leadership portrayed by the leader which is mostly done through leading examples, employees olfactory perception motivated and the admiration of copying the good examples of their leaders is e nhanced. In an onslaught to elaborate motivation and the effects, several theories have been put forward. In this physical composition few theories have been borrowed to expand further the contribution of motivation.According to (Kahneman and moth miller (1986)) Our human behavior provide be more or slight be influenced by the steads towards certain fields, determinations and the capacity of attaining a specified province forget highly depend on the encountering of the inward drive. This is clearly elaborated in the attitude-behavior consistency possible action. Leaders attempt to learn the attitude of their employee through the interaction and knowing their behaviors in which they often know or decide on the way to motivate them. They also have the certificate of indebtedness in influencing their employees attitude may be towards the organizations strategies.Consistency opening of motivation attempts to elaborate that individuals mostly achieve their motives through di stinguished coordination of the willingness and the capableness to perform. Employees will always feel motivated under the circumstances in which leaders and managers create a conducive environment for them to integrate their faculty led by the will to perform these responsibilities. According to (Milgram, S. , 1983) a long situation of the capability of the employee is essential to be applied by the managers in order to clearly understand and develop the right methods in motivating the employees.According to (Adams, J. Stacey, 1965), another theory of motivation is the equity theory. This theory dwells mostly as the appreciation done to the employees through the rewards. Considerations are always authoritative in the determination of the employees who may be rewarded match to their contribution. Its every daylight that rewards differ according to the quantified duties well done by the individual employee or a group. Satisfaction of the employees is always determined by the rew ard win as deserved. De-motivation is likely to occur if the distribution of rewards does not match with the effort applied in the achievements.Expectancy theory clearly defines a causa which move overs to the motivation of employees. According to (Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. , 1991) either on the reliance on the antecedent experience in the organization or through the organization procedure, the employee will add a lot of effort in relation to the reward expected. In other words employees may improve greatly on their duties under the influence of the targeted reward which they expect to get after achieving their goals. standardized to expectations of the management towards achievements of the organizational goals, employees expects the full support from the management.This can be brought about by the keen consideration of the state of the employees as previously discussed employees will aim at fulfilling their duties following the attention from the management and leaders who ha ve the responsibility of giving correct directives. motivated employees will thitherfore feel to be fairly treated after being rewarded from their effort according to how much they achieved. This will in that respectfore combine and relate equity theory and expectancy theory of motivation as discussed.Following the fact that achievement is among the most important goal in an organization, it is important for managers and leaders to subject their efforts in order to achieve it. In order to attain supremacy they have to depend on their employees. In other words the performance of the employees will therefore depend on the management and leadership in the organization. One of the impacts of motivation to employees is the increase in productivity. Right motivation from the managers and leaders will cause the employees to be more active and potential which will be implemented in their duties.Motivation from the managers to their employees has also been associated with the expansion an d the process of the organization. Motivated employees will always do a quality profession which can have a distinguished difference when compared with the competitors. In such(prenominal) a situation the intended or the targeted client will focus more on that specific organization and in swallow the step-up of the organization will be realized. Positively motivated employee will be more innovative and they will be able to contribute to the teamwork in an organization hence minimizing the unexpected pull back which may be brought about by the lack of cooperation.Creativity will also be enhanced and this will contribute a lot in approach up with the new ideas. Sustainability of employees has been a difficult and a challenge to many a(prenominal) organizations. This is brought about by the fact that employees need satisfaction while job their duties. Managers in collaboration with leaders successfully overcome the challenges of employee sustainability through positive motivatio n to their employees and they eventually find that they critically crop the level of day to day recruitment of new staff to replace the ones who have resigned.This will also improve the work that is done due to the experience gained by the employees they can comfortably and undoubtedly implement it. Motivated employees become employ to their duties and responsibility in the organization thereby reducing the errors and careless mistakes which would reduce the credibility of the organization. Though its a complex crop if the managers maximize on motivating their employees they will also in return contribute directly or indirectly to simplifying the managers duties of planning, controlling and arrange the organization which is contrary to de-motivated employees.The leaders on the other hand will have more room to improve their initiatives and efficiency. Irrespective of the type and the sizing of the organization, motivation to the employees stands to be a key factor in the achieve ment of goals. Considering example of institutes like universities, learning centers, production centers and others, It is through the aspect of motivation to the employees that their abilities attitudes and their interest can be utilized which will in return promote the organization name both locally and internationally.In most parts of the world most organization has reportedly realized their goals through the hard work and coordination attributed to the employees. Following this good and improved performance there has always been a system of motivating the employees through the integrative and cooperative methods put forward by the managers and leaders. According to the chairman and chief executive officer of Coca-Cola Company Mr. Neville Isdell, the company has realized positive performance and success due to good and favorable conditions which of cause have been brought about by the cooperation of the employees and commitment.This can otherwise be affected if the employees are de-motivated hence this is a good example of the impact of managers and leaders on the motivation of their employee. inference In every organization, the concept of motivation by the managers and leaders to their employees has accounted to awe-inspiring success to many organizations through the increased productivity of the organization, expansion and yield of the organization, satisfied and lively employees, minimization of errors and accidents and so on.It has been noted also that there are several methods and ways in which the employees are motivated. It is therefore the responsibility of the leaders and mangers to fully involve themselves in practical consideration of the performance of their employees and the necessary improvements required. Motivation is a more complex exercise but the devotional strategies that may be applied by the leaders and managers are essential to achieve the positive outcomes.