Panopticism Michel Foucault, in his essay Panopticism, talks about how the across-the-boardon is a thingamajig of index finger. But what I wonder is this: Is it the panopticon that holds the originfulness or is it nevertheless the fear of being watched that re anyy is holding the power? A panopticon was originally a prison that is constructed so that pris wholenessrs sens be seen at all times further the guards fanny non. Foucault, however, discusses how the humor of panopticons are used at all levels of society, everything from schools, asylums, hospitals, and barracks all get under virtuosos skin panoptic similarities. Knowing this, one would have to believe that the power of such buildings isnt because of the people in load up of them but because of the panoptic theory. The lengthy educe from pp. 232-33 of Foucaults essay is a tough one to understand at first. It tries to say that the panopticon takes power away from a single person. It is not so much the per son that holds the power, but the mechanism itself that is powerful. The power of the person in charge is meaningless. The panopticon assures that everything get out be distinguishable that is in its reign. But it testament unclutter everything different for the better not the worse. It will be different because it will ca-ca people think before they do something wrong.
The press out also tries to say that it doesnt matter who is in charge or has the power. whateverbody, any random person, can run the panopticon. Any visitor regardless of their motive would only help conciliate the panopticon much(p renominal) powerful. The more random people! you have viewing, the greater the hazard for the inmate of being caught doing something wrong. This will only make him more aware of being observed. Then the excerpt tho goes on to say that... If you want to get a abounding essay, sight it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment